A Joke
There are always two hundred thirty nine beans in a bowl of chilli.
Because one more would make it too farty.
Sometimes people come to me for advice and I say "Yeah, do that".
There are always two hundred thirty nine beans in a bowl of chilli.
Because one more would make it too farty.
Posted by Anonymous at 5/20/2005 09:01:00 AM 1 comments
Voting is under way for the Major League Baseball All Star game. You can vote online at www.mlb.com or www.orioles.com .
Vote for:
Brian Roberts, 2nd base, American League
Roberts leads all AL 2nd basemen in Batting Average, Stolen Bases, Walks, Total Bases, Runs Batted In, Home Runs, Triples, Hits and Runs Scored and has a .977 Fielding Percentage.
Miguel Tejada, shortstop, American League
Tejada leads all AL SS in Total Bases, Runs Batted In, Home Runs, Doubles and Hits and has a .968 Fielding Percentage
Melvin Mora, 3rd Base, American League
Mora leads all AL 3rd basemen in Stolen Bases, Doubles and Hits. He is 2nd among 3rd basemen in Batting Average, Home Runs and Runs Batted In. He has a .967 Fielding Percentage (4th best among starting 3rd basemen).
Vote for these 3 players. Do it. Do it now. Do it every time you go online.
Posted by Stanley at 5/19/2005 08:34:00 AM 0 comments
So here's the deal. I plan on ranting and raving about my writing class. I had to write a paper where I analyse two texts that were written by the same author. These texts have the same theme of lonliness throughout America. Anyhow the texts are from two different genres. One is an essay, and the other was a short story. In my paper, I analysed the effectiveness of the genres in conveying their theme to the audience (me).
Basically my essay said that the essay was full of bullshit and that the author just tried to make herself sound more intellegent than she was. Also I said taht the short story got the theme off very effectively by keeping the reader (again me) interested. Now I said all of this in a much nicer way. I analysed the differences between the two. I also went to the Learning Resource Center and met with a writing tutor about my paper. When I left that, I revised my paper mechanics, the grammar, and all that other good stuff. I turned in what I thought to be an A paper, B+ at worst.
Anyhow, I know the tutur who helped me with the paper, so when I got the paper back, I went to show her how I did. (The tutor is Jimmy my best friends gf). Anyhow I got a C on the paper, which is the same grade I've gotten on EVERY PAPER for the ENTIRE CLASS. As Jenny and I went over the paper and read the teachers comments, we realized that the teacher wasn't taking poings off for my mechanics, or my organization, or my grammar, but for my ideas. Basicall I lost credit on the paper because I felt that the essay was written just to sound smart. I stated in my paper that the essay tends to lose the reader because it doesn't flow well. I also stated that the essay didn't flow well because it was written to "sound smart". The teacher responded with "The only reason a reader would get lost in this essay is if they lacked the critical thinking skill necessary to follow it."
Well in general I think I got a bullshit grade. Also, I have to re-submit the paper, and in order to get the grade I need, i'm going to have to put in HER ideas. I don't want to do it, but I don't think I have any other choice. I am VERY angry about all of this.
P.S. I have a new girlfriend for those of you who are behind on my love life. Her name is Marcie.
Posted by Anonymous at 5/05/2005 07:02:00 PM 1 comments